@article{oai:fukuyama-u.repo.nii.ac.jp:00008177,
 author = {小野, 泰},
 journal = {福山大学工学部紀要},
 month = {Dec},
 note = {P(論文), According to the Kretchmer and H.Rorschach, color-form problem at the recognition of the object was related to the personality as a difference of the attitude for environment. Kretchmer, analyzed the differences of perceptional and representational style between the cycloid and schizoid temperament subjects by the psychological experiment. The main experimental method to distinguish them was an way of the perception of the objects by tachistoscope. The figure of various color and form are presented to the subject for a short time, and it is requested to find the figure shown beforehand from among that. Color viewer catches the stimulus from the external world by the attitude so as if to enjoy them, and form viewer catches them by the attitude to analyze them by mental activities. These are thought to be an opposite two attitudes regarding to the production and the contemplation of the art including the architecture. J.D. kheen experimented by 8 methods including tachistoscope method, later Ono and et all found the common factor between them. But these method need longer time for individual subject to experiment, so we must search the method to experiment for a group subjects. Akiyama et all proposed the method to measure the individual sensibility for color (or form) at the recognition of the objects by SD method. The problems of the analysis by the SD method are the color, the shape of the stimulus, and kind of the adjectives to evaluate it. It was analyzed that the appropriate adjectives for experiment are those which reacts both change of color and shape, and which evaluate the value of the stimulus.},
 pages = {121--126},
 title = {建築の色彩と形態認知における個人差に関する研究 : SD法による分析方法の問題点},
 volume = {28},
 year = {2004}
}